Updated June 4, 2008
"Form follows function - that
has been misunderstood. Form and function should be one…"
- Frank
Lloyd Wright
Because the Internet is all digital
surface, appearances are very powerful. The mere look of
your website can say volumes about your business.
Therefore, a serious ecommerce
website wants to transmit a clear, immediate and authoritative message
that it means business, that it's reputable, credible, and technically
hip.
So what better way to signal one's
business legitimacy than by integrating the newest design innovation
into your website?
Well… answering that question means
taking a plunge into design theory and looking at architectural
concerns about website form and ecommerce function.
Indeed, reconciling form with function
(and aesthetics with use-value) has always been a point of contention
- on or offline. In 'Learning from Las Vegas', architect Robert
Venturi stressed the centrality of form, decoration and ornamentation
in design. Unconcerned with issues like internal layout, function,
or usability, Venturi argued (against modernism) that less was
not more, but rather 'less was a bore'. To this end, he identified
the Las Vegas Strip as design benchmark par excellence.
Needless to say, the instant 'e'
was yoked to 'commerce', a version of this Vegas design principle
found a foothold on the Web.
In banners, we have all the kinetic
neon of the Vegas Strip; in animated graphics, we have the shimmering
of a rhinestone cape. From garish pop-up windows, disabled back-buttons,
bloated pyrotechnics and indulgent flash to navigation that drives
customers through color-crazed mazes, ecommerce web design often
appears to mirror Vegas frenzy and immoderation. Even on the same
corporate webpage, marketing messages compete violently for our
attention, content seethes non-sequentially, and the pure density
of text and links do little more than overwhelm. It's casino ecommerce
- or as Venturi calls it, 'the kitsch of high capitalism.'
Yes, a quick glance at a cross-section
of ecommerce websites will indicate that, for many businesses,
'unsound design methodology' is only slightly more popular than
'no design methodology at all'. On other sites, user orientation
and site usability are frequently sacrificed for more indulgent
artistic ends. Even navigation bars have become the latest theatre
for self-conscious Java script applications, distracting from design
purpose or testing visitor patience.
The problem here is that even seriously
interesting design can interfere with usability. Innovation, whether
aesthetic or technical, can disrupt user interactivity, design purpose,
or commerce objectives. It's true that mouse-over navigation bars
- especially the ones that activate telescoping sub-directories
- look impressive. Similarly, a solid flash intro can show that
your e-business is not an Internet fly-by-night. But the problem
is that form can subvert function, notably when design involves
innovation or requires the user to adapt to a new set of usability
rules or a new kind of interface. And when form distorts function,
then the medium does not become the message - it obscures it.
Adapting Messages to
Media
For websites that prioritize function
over form (and use-value over artistry), one web design strategy
is to simply emulate the logic, order, and appearance of traditional
print media - thus anchoring the user in familiar territory with
familiar usability rules. Many conservative ecommerce sites take
this route, complete with 'folder' style nav bars, predictable interface,
and text-heavy content loaded with mission statements and marketing
minutia. Often, these sites show a disregard for space - or spatial
economy - and forget that in order to hit home with a primary message,
deleting other messages becomes mandatory.
The problem with copying print strategy
is that while the layout might be reassuringly 'retro', the medium
itself is all Internet, with it's own implicit hypertextual conventions
and practices. Though the Web is still primarily a text-driven medium,
its rules are not the same as print, at once combining expanded
'interactivity' (endless possibility) with a shortened attention
span imported from video-culture (want it all now). Both
'print' and 'casino' styled ecommerce sites risk choking interactivity
and disrupting task-based goals like retrieving desired information
or making a purchase.
The goal of web design then becomes
to tailor the message to the medium - and to balance design with
task-based ends. At least for ecommerce sites, design should harmonize
function and form towards the enhancement of both. As the Bauhaus
school put it, the goal of design is to develop a functional (website)
architecture integrating art, technology and use-value - without
being self-referential in the design process. In other words, if
your site visitor is spending time noticing how great the site design
is or how spectacular the navigation tools look, a serious error
has already been made.
Here, what's essential is understanding
the reflex level of user interactivity and then designing
a task-analysis blueprint. Predicting reactions, reflexes, and how
users respond to and interact with various web environments and
stimuli is key. This means anticipating visitors needs, prioritizing
your messages and tasks, predicting what user questions will be
asked (in what order), and quickly providing the answers in a navigable,
'scaffolded' format that keeps your visitor oriented and engaged.
Scaffolding refers to an educational
concept concerning how much information a user can assimilate in
one stage - or on one webpage - and requires the designer to build
sites that conform to learning mechanics. Hence, content, directions,
and visuals should be 'chunked' or structured to guide the user
through gradually more complex content towards an end-goal (while
simultaneously providing clear navigation options so users can control
the gradient of a learning/informating curve).
Sadly, Vegas Strip web design or
graphics-happy sites rarely pay attention to task-analysis methodology.
More often than not, messages, marketing slogans, and links step
all over each other to create a visual cacophony - like a half-dozen
heavy metal guitar solos being reeled off at the same time. And
while design innovations may stimulate site visitors, the same techniques
can also over-stimulate, as well as elicit impatience, indifference,
or the dreaded immediate flight-impulse.
On the other hand, the purely functionalist
goal of web design is to make the message advance as the medium
recedes. Theoretically, this would mean killing any artistic or
design impulse whatsoever. But would you want a website that looks
ASCII?
As Hemingway proved, it's still
a style to have no style - and even minimalist sites generally involve
extensive design consideration. In fact, some sites can be so
minimal that their 'absences' are more distracting and self-conscious
than the most haphazardly designed news portals. Alternately, some
designers suggest that great web design should highlight function
by being design-neutral or aesthetically 'transparent'. However,
that's no fun, and it's probably a myth that design-neutrality can
exist anyway. Besides, ecommerce cornerstones like 'branding' and
'differentiation' depend on aesthetics and visceral, reflex impressions.
The point is, let the David Bowie
homepage risk impressing its users. Even banaldesign.com
uses a high-modernist, highly functional, Bauhaus web-template to
sell its highly a-functional, postmodern inventory. Again, uniting
form with function should remain your guiding architectural principle.
Think about how users interact and learn with various media, interfaces,
and web environments. Perceiving web design from the standpoint
of task-analysis and learning theory is probably the best compass
you can bring to your architectural blueprint.
|